> A man's man who can barely remember which shoe goes on which foot.
> The link below points to a letter written by another former Vietnam POW. > This letter should be read by anyone who plans to vote for president > this November.
"alt.politics.bush" <thomasw...@hotmail.com> wrote: > 21 August 2008
> Fay turns towards Florida once again, sniffing out Limo Limbaugh. > Oh, where, oh, where/does my true love dwell? When the Spirit of God > hears the sound of blood lust coming across the Golden Microphone of > the Enemas In Broadcast Network, it begins a spiral of agitation in a > sort of cosmic version of a feeding frenzy. Right now, it is wringing > out all the water it sucks up over the Atlantic without much wind, but > if Florida was to toss in an execution or two this weekend, the furies > may become roused. If McCain was to choose Tom Ridge, Limo Limbaugh > would have a conniption as the neo-cons are ushered to the cheap seats > in the bleachers, where they should never have been allowed to > leave.
> I donıt know why McCain is so anxious to kiss the ass of neo-con > girly-boys like Rich Lowry, Chicken Hawks like John Bolton and candy- > ass Pro-Life Christians like John Hagee. It must have something to do > with the sweet-nothings Steve Schmidt is blowing up his bustles. > McCainıs real problem as a fighter pilot is a profound target > fascination that leaves him subject to the blind-side disaster, such > as when he got shot down. Schmidt is his wing man, but there is > nothing to defend him against Schmidtıs blind side and Schmidtıs blind > side is basically the same as Rich Lowryıs.
> Which is why I think McCain-Ridge is the dream team. Ridge has been > part of a point team a time or two and his blind side is not Rich > Lowryıs or Limo Limbaughıs or Cheneyıs or Bushieıs. Especially > Bushieıs. The difference between adult leadership being stuck on > stupid is the difference between Tom Ridge and Bushie.
> McCain has this ad out where a woman voice over is talking pretty > much the way Ditto Heads pass out the party line around the water > cooler or at wedding receptions or after church and finishes up the ad > with the assertion that Obamaıs tax plans will lead to economic > disaster.
> We are already in the middle of an economic disaster as a result of > 27 years of the Free Market principles of William F. Buckley, Jr.,ıs > conservatism. I am personally fully in favor of personal wealth and > the fact that McCain owns 7 houses reflects a prudent investment > portfolio. Itıs hard to beat real estate for parking wealth until you > need it. But Obamaıs remark that the economy looks different to > someone with 7 houses than someone who has lost his/her house because > of the sub-prime debacle or corporate downsizing or someone who > doesnıt have McCainıs health care plan and needs it. The confluence > of the Reagan Revolution, Gingrichıs Contract With America and > Bushieıs Compassionate Conservatism is stranding the American middle > class on the sand of the lake bed where trickle down economics has > trickled out. This is what Edwardıs 2 Americas looks like. This the > reality McCain refuses to acknowledge and Obama is equipped to > transform.
> And thatıs the truth. > Just for the record, McCainıs ads have got one thing exactly correct: > we are worse off now than we were ever just 4 years ago, much less > since Phil Gramm begin to install Voodoo economics in the tax code and > related legislation.
They're probably his wife's homes. She got rich by virtue of being the daughter of a mobster. (daddy took the rap for the head mobster of Arizona, served time, and was rewarded with a big beer distributorship) It was valued at $200 mill, back in 2000. She got 37% of it.
On Aug 21, 1:22 pm, Cindy Hamilton <angelicapagane...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 20, 5:52 pm, phil scott <p...@philscott.net> wrote:
> I haven't watched the video, but why on earth would you want to vote > for > a dumb guy?
Dumb guys can be just as capable as smart guys at following orders. Imo, the Rockefeller Empire controls both candidates. Foreign policy will be directed by either Zbigniew B., or Kissinger, both long-time servitors of the Rockefellers.
Cabinet posts will be filled with Trilateral Commission members and/or CFR guys.
THe same Wall Street gang (Goldman Sachs and such) will serve as econ advisors regardless of who sits on the throne. (Imo, in the US, changing presidents is little more than changing of the guard)
".....You know, by the time you become the leader of a country, someone else makes all the decisions." ~Bill Clinton speaking in Ireland (August 1998)
<JonLeip...@myway.com> wrote: > On Aug 21, 1:22 pm, Cindy Hamilton <angelicapagane...@hotmail.com> > wrote:
> > On Aug 20, 5:52 pm, phil scott <p...@philscott.net> wrote:
> > I haven't watched the video, but why on earth would you want to vote > > for > > a dumb guy?
> Dumb guys can be just as capable as smart guys at following orders. > Imo, the Rockefeller Empire controls both candidates. Foreign policy > will be directed by either Zbigniew B., or Kissinger, both long-time > servitors of the Rockefellers.
> Cabinet posts will be filled with Trilateral Commission members and/or > CFR guys.
> THe same Wall Street gang (Goldman Sachs and such) will serve as econ > advisors > regardless of who sits on the throne. (Imo, in the US, changing > presidents is little more than changing of the guard)
> ".....You know, by the time you become the leader of a country, > someone else makes all the decisions." ~Bill Clinton speaking in > Ireland (August 1998)
an accurate assessment.... and that goes on even over the violent protests of the people.
The historical solution has been a total collapse of the working class, then due to insufficient tax base to fund military operations and govt, collapse of govt... the markers of this final stage are well known. Importing slave labor, as the currency is debased and wars are begun to seize the assets of other nations.
Such wars generate enemies on a 360 degree perimeter and incite those brough in to do the heavy labor to viiolence... such attack is not remotely defensible... the nation collapses.
The reboot cycle used to take 2 or 3 generations, in the past hundred years, its down to a generation or so. These are not to be confused with the more comon depression cycles... these are national life cycles (at approx 5 generations, the last one having become terminally corrupt).
