Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
_Peregrine: Primus_ and the Christian Empire
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  6 messages - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
mimus  
View profile
 More options Aug 20, 7:40 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
From: mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 07:40:15 -0400
Local: Wed, Aug 20 2008 7:40 am
Subject: _Peregrine: Primus_ and the Christian Empire
I was kind of surprised recently, on finally picking up a used copy of the
mass-market paperback in the US of Avram Davidson's _Peregrine: Primus_
(I've always been put off by the blurb), to find it fairly frank about the
theocratic brutality of the Christian Empire that succeeded the Roman
Empire-- "Halt, stranger! does the Holy Spirit proceed by or through the
Son?" <sweat>-- so reminiscent of the English Commonwealth, not to mention
certain modern-day regimes, not necessarily Christian . . . .

I found it something of a hard read, due to the slightly clunkily goofy
tone, which made the seriousness of the end sort of a shock, but it was
alright, and might well grow on me.

I'm a big fan of Davidson's _The Island Under the Earth_ and the "Vergil
Magus" books.

And just whatever happened to our promised sequels to _TIUE_, _The
Six-Limbed Folk_ and _The Cap of Grace_? Davidson and Panshin get together
and decide to drive us all crazy?

--

Sight Leviathan? hear Rahab?

< _The Island Under the Earth_


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Eric Walker  
View profile
 More options Aug 21, 8:46 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
From: Eric Walker <em...@owlcroft.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:46:08 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Aug 21 2008 8:46 pm
Subject: Re: _Peregrine: Primus_ and the Christian Empire
On Aug 20, 4:40 am, mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> wrote:

[...]

> And just whatever happened to our promised sequels to _TIUE_, _The
> Six-Limbed Folk_ and _The Cap of Grace_? Davidson and Panshin get
> together and decide to drive us all crazy?

"Sadly, from the viewpoint of us readers, Davidson was, as one
friendly critic put it, a butterfly, forever flitting from project to
project as new ideas came to him. In consequence, he left unfinished--
in some cases hardly started--series whose missing members we can only
lament. We must simply treasure what we have, for treasure it
is." (http://greatsfandf.com/AUTHORS/AvramDavidson.php)

Panshin does not have any such excuse.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
mimus  
View profile
 More options Aug 21, 9:53 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
From: mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:53:06 -0400
Local: Thurs, Aug 21 2008 9:53 pm
Subject: Re: _Peregrine: Primus_ and the Christian Empire

Was that an excuse?

--

It is great Pity, no doubt, fo Fine a Project fhould Mifcarry.

< _A Modest Defence of Publick Stews_


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Richard R. Hershberger  
View profile
 More options Aug 22, 10:17 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
From: "Richard R. Hershberger" <rrhe...@acme.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 07:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Aug 22 2008 10:17 am
Subject: Re: _Peregrine: Primus_ and the Christian Empire
On Aug 20, 7:40 am, mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> I was kind of surprised recently, on finally picking up a used copy of the
> mass-market paperback in the US of Avram Davidson's _Peregrine: Primus_
> (I've always been put off by the blurb), to find it fairly frank about the
> theocratic brutality of the Christian Empire that succeeded the Roman
> Empire-- "Halt, stranger! does the Holy Spirit proceed by or through the
> Son?" <sweat>-- so reminiscent of the English Commonwealth, not to mention
> certain modern-day regimes, not necessarily Christian . . .

That question threw me at first, as I took "by" or "through" as
alternatives to choose from, but then I realized that the context must
be "by or through" as one choice, and "not by or through" as the
other.  So this is easy, if you don't personally care about the
theology of the question:  if the person asks in Greek, answer "no".
If the question is in Latin, answer "yes".

But seriously, I find implausible the idea of routinely accosting
passersby to quiz them on fine points of doctrine.  In 16th and 17th
century England there were many people--likely the majority, really--
who didn't care one way or the other and went quietly about their
business.  This included clergy.  There is an account of one parish
priest during the Henry/Edward/Mary/Elizabeth period who said that he
would be happy to have the fancy church stuff in the church or to put
it in the basement:  just keep him up to date on where it should be.
There are sometimes circumstances where the activists on the two sides
consider this unacceptable and force the issue, but more commonly they
don't.

Richard R. Hershberger


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
David E. Siegel  
View profile
 More options Aug 22, 5:47 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
From: "David E. Siegel" <sie...@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:47:32 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Aug 22 2008 5:47 pm
Subject: Re: _Peregrine: Primus_ and the Christian Empire
On Aug 22, 10:17 am, "Richard R. Hershberger" <rrhe...@acme.com>
wrote:

According to at least some historical accounts, and much SF/Fantasy/
Alternate history, such a question in 6th century Rome or Byzantium
would not have been uncommon, and basically served as a proxy for "Are
you one of us or one of the bad guys" whcih tends to gets asked of
strangers in one form or another during troubled times any-and-
everywhere.

-DES


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Gene  
View profile
 More options Aug 23, 3:56 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
From: Gene <g...@chewbacca.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:56:04 GMT
Local: Sat, Aug 23 2008 3:56 pm
Subject: Re: _Peregrine: Primus_ and the Christian Empire
"Richard R. Hershberger" <rrhe...@acme.com> rote in news:10c29041-257c-
406c-9ae6-30d741217...@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:

> There is an account of one parish
> priest during the Henry/Edward/Mary/Elizabeth period who said that he
> would be happy to have the fancy church stuff in the church or to put
> it in the basement:  just keep him up to date on where it should be.

The Vicar of Bray

In good King Charles's golden days,
When Loyalty no harm meant;
A Furious High-Church man I was,
And so I gain'd Preferment.
Unto my Flock I daily Preach'd,
Kings are by God appointed,
And Damn'd are those who dare resist,
Or touch the Lord's Anointed.

    And this is law, I will maintain
    Unto my Dying Day, Sir.
    That whatsoever King may reign,
    I will be the Vicar of Bray, Sir!

When Royal James possest the crown,
And popery grew in fashion;
The Penal Law I houted down,
And read the Declaration:
The Church of Rome I found would fit
Full well my Constitution,
And I had been a Jesuit,
But for the Revolution.
And this is Law, &c.

When William our Deliverer came,
To heal the Nation's Grievance,
I turn'd the Cat in Pan again,
And swore to him Allegiance:
Old Principles I did revoke,
Set conscience at a distance,
Passive Obedience is a Joke,
A Jest is non-resistance.
And this is Law, &c.

When Royal Ann became our Queen,
Then Church of England's Glory,
Another face of things was seen,
And I became a Tory:
Occasional Conformists base
I Damn'd, and Moderation,
And thought the Church in danger was,
From such Prevarication.
And this is Law, &c.

When George in Pudding time came o'er,
And Moderate Men looked big, Sir,
My Principles I chang'd once more,
And so became a Whig, Sir.
And thus Preferment I procur'd,
From our Faith's great Defender,
And almost every day abjur'd
The Pope, and the Pretender.
And this is Law, &c.

The Illustrious House of Hannover,
And Protestant succession,
To these I lustily will swear,
Whilst they can keep possession:
For in my Faith, and Loyalty,
I never once will faulter,
But George, my lawful king shall be,
Except the Times shou'd alter.
And this is Law, &c.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google